| If You Reside In A Smaller Suburb Or Country Setting Are You Safer Than In A City? |
|
Written by admin, September 29th, 2011
|
|
by Lucretia G. Stark It has often been hypothesized that violence seems to rise in densely populated areas. In this book, Malcolm Gladwell points out the observation that has been made to support this hypothesis: when you pack too many species, or people, in one area or small space, there is a rising probability of them becoming aggressive with one another. Walking down any street in a city, you have a bigger chance of seeing a violent act than in one that doesnât, even though it is possible to see it anywhere in the world, including rural places. What are ways people can oppose violence in the metropolis? In many violent episodes, people agree that they would do anything they could to protect themselves and their loved ones from violent individuals. Retaliation in the form of defense is also a huge option for those who feel threatened. Can someone use violence in these situations and it create a positive impact? The thought process on this type of reaction doesnât seem to be useful since two sides fighting using violence always turns out bad. Ethical beliefs play a huge role in the way that people deal with violence because they donât believe that these types of violent retaliations change the world for the better. If you are interested in obtaining a great understanding of personal ethics, you should look into a company called NXIVM. Sara Bronfman has a center recently put in New York City Executive Success Program by NXIVM. This is a prime spot to study the effects of violence as it pertains to the citizens of New York City. The question is, how can ethics positively affect violence — even in the middle of an already violent society? Good and bad choice making is part of how ethics works. Theyâre the moral code by which an individual lives his or her life Nancy Salzman. If a personâs ethics are not absolutely defined, a person might find themselves conflicted often about what they will or wonât decide to do. When a person finds themselves being able to create choices without blinking or having to sit down and think about it, many times they have strong ethical beliefs. They are more likely to be consistent and feel a sensation of surety about their decision. People can definitely be indecisive about violence and ways to handle it. Most of us wouldnât think to violently mug another person. If you have a good stable ethical background, the thought of hurting someone, letting alone killing them, would not even cross our minds. What makes this a real idea? Is it possible we are not naturally violent beings? Will we see positive effects on the way we feel about the topic of violence if we build better ethics? If people have been raised with an objective view of violence, is there a way to teach them something different? We will undoubtedly feel differently about violence, if we use the tools available to us to change any violent potential we may have.
|
